Thursday, March 11, 2010
Subscribe to The Bandon Western World| Southern Oregon Coast Classified Ads| Homes| Coast Auto Finder| Job Seekers and Employment

» Oregon voters raise taxes

While statewide voters approved Measures 66 and 67 in Tuesday’s special election, Coos and Curry counties voted no.

With all the precincts counted, Coos County voters rejected Measure 66, with 11,805 votes (53 percent) against the measure and 10,605 votes (47 percent) for the measure, According to the Coos County Elections Division.

Measure 66 raises income taxes on individuals making more than $125,000 per year, or $250,000 for couples, estimated at fewer than 3 percent of filers, according to the State of Oregon.

Coos County voters also defeated Measure 67, which raises the minimum tax on businesses from $10 to at least $150. Coos County voters cast 12,001 votes against Measure 67 (53 percent), and 10,459 votes in favor (47 percent).

Voter turnout in Coos County was almost 65 percent.

Statewide, with 91 percent of the vote counted, the vote was 54-46 on Measure 66 and 53-47 on Measure 67. Oregon voters have consistently rebuffed legislative attempts to take more in tax revenue — such as a cigarette tax to pay for health insurance for children three years ago, two previous income tax measures that would have hit most Oregonians and nine sales tax measures over the decades.

The vote affirms the two-year budget the Legislature controlled by Democrats adopted last year, and spares it $727 million worth of budget cutting during a four-week session that begins Monday.

No one knows exactly what impact Measures 66 and 67 will have on Oregon’s economy, but Sen. Joanne Verger, D-Coos Bay, knows it won’t make business in Salem any easier.

“It’s been a very divisive campaign,” she said. “I just think we’ve got to do better in learning how to come together just so we don’t have to have this kind of thing.”

Rep. Wayne Krieger, R-Gold Beach, said he wasn’t surprised the tax measures passed, suggesting voters were roused to vote by misleading ads. He is concerned economic recovery could take longer with the additional taxes.

“At some point, they just have to say we’ve got to stop this unprecedented growth in spending,” he said. Supporters of the bill had suggested the failure of Measures 66 and 67 would have left schools and other public agencies facing cuts.

World staff writer Alexander Rich contributed to this story.
Email this story  |  Print this story  |  News Index |  Previous |  Next
The comments above are from users of bandonwesternworld.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The Bandon Western World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
   Comments & User Feedback

A Bandon Hopewrote on Feb 2, 2010 1:54 PM:

It wasn't that long ago that this country rewarded people who secured an education, worked hard, started a business, employed others and made money.

Now it's fashionable to blame them for one's own lack of education, ambition, money and success. Oregon has officially distinguished itself on the national stage as a state of whining, complaining, and self-serving wimps - and Salem and it's unions lead the pack. It's embarrassing.

CAreaderwrote on Jan 30, 2010 11:14 AM:

Oh, my. You voted to give your legislators more of your money so they can invent more ways to keep spending it. Either you Oregonians have learned very little by observing your bankrupt border state to the South, or you now have a majority of transplanted Californians voting in your elections....Either way, you've got some tough years ahead.

472wrote on Jan 29, 2010 3:12 PM:

According to the Voter's Pamphlet literature, $242M already maintains the state for this year through 2012. Reason for measure is to increase the General Fund for future expenditure where taxes would help increase the fund for more Oregon/State Revenue. The Feds will help match the increase to a hopeful $472M by end of 2012 (from our raised taxes).

A Bandon Hopewrote on Jan 28, 2010 1:14 PM:

Reduced taxes create more opportunities for people to work, thus more people pay taxes on more money they make which in turn brings in more revenue? LOWERING TAXES BRINGS IN MORE FOR THE GOVERNMENT THAN RAISING TAXES. History tells us so, repeatedly.


When you take my money with more taxes, that is money that I am not spending at local restaurants, shops, local car dealerships, shopping centers, etc. It is hurtful to the small, local (city) economies and it reduces available monies for businesses to expand their facilities or labor force with -- all of which would be more helpful to the economy long-term versus the State thinking they know better how to spend my money than I do. The State doesn't create, it only consumes.


Applying a tax retroactively is not fair and etchical (Measure 67). It's like a landlord increasing your rent today, then saying that you owe thousands of dollars in back rent for the past year even though you met your obligations.

Perhaps the State thinks they need more revenue, but this is an unethical, harmful, criminal, and unsustainable way to go about it.

   Post Comment:
(optional)
Current Word Count: